Officially released May 21, 2019.
The Only Part of the Case that Matters for Connecticut Practitioners: A California Judgment was filed in Connecticut pursuant to § 46b-71 and, thereafter, motions were filed. The trial court correctly applied California substantively law to the judgment in disposing of the motions and did not abuse its discretion. There was a dog bite involved. The end.
Disclaimer:
The summaries contained in this blog are intended for Licensed Connecticut Attorneys. The reader is cautioned that the summaries and holdings from each case are only current as of the date the decisions were released. Review of this blog is not a substitute for conducting current legal research from primary sources nor for consulting with counsel. © Louden, Katz & McGrath, LLC.
